research-document DOC-FE-BND-2026-07-28-PROFILE-AUDIT-FRONTIER
ROS–Framework Engineering Profile v1.0 Audit frontier
ROS–Framework Engineering Profile v1.0 Audit: document frontier
Source and coverage
- Source:
research/evaluations/FE-BOUNDARY-2026-07-28/ros-fe-profile-v1-audit.md - Canonical ID:
FE-BND-2026-07-28-PROFILE-AUDIT - Lifecycle status:
current-provisional - Artifact type:
implementation-audit - Version: 1.0.0
- Confidence: 0.9
- Inclusion rule: eligible lifecycle status: current-provisional
- Analysis unit: ROS-FE-V1
Phase 1 — knowledge extraction
- Primary objective: Provide a versioned pilot execution and record profile for Framework Engineering research.
- Primary claims: The profile is usable for synthetic low-consequence pilots. It is not sufficient for unattended promotion or strong conformance claims.
- Supporting evidence: The source's declared references and the co-analyzed records listed in the analysis-unit frontier.
- Methodology: Repository audit, baseline execution, schema and validator inspection, and test execution.
- Accepted/current findings: v1.0 remains the accepted pilot baseline. High-severity integrity gaps require a v1.1 proposal.
- Rejected or unsupported findings: A green current validation proves complete execution or lineage integrity.
- Assumptions: Human promotion authority prevents the worst automation harms. Current pilots are low consequence.
- Limitations: Execution-local records, references, duplicate identity, and manifests are incompletely validated.
- Known uncertainties: Negative-test coverage; Migration safety; Cross-repository dependency integrity.
- Declared headings inspected: ROS–FE Profile v1.0 audit; Audit scope; What works; Findings; Compatibility judgment; v1.1 priority sequence; P0 — integrity; P1 — declared-surface completeness; P2 — research operations; Change policy; Audit conclusion.
Phase 2 — unresolved unknowns
- Negative-test coverage
- Migration safety
- Cross-repository dependency integrity
Phase 3 — adversarial challenge
The manifest declares a broader contract than the validator enforces.
Evidence that would materially change this assessment includes a completed independent replication, a preregistered negative control, a matched causal comparison, a governance disposition, or a demonstrated failure of the measurement and integrity instruments relevant to this source.
Top five traceable opportunities
| Rank for this document | Record | Opportunity | Category | Frontier score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RFR-2026-008 | ROS profile integrity and negative-test suite | Engineering | 295 |
| 2 | RFR-2026-014 | Adversarial provenance and evidence-integrity study | Security | 136 |
| 3 | RFR-2026-009 | Cross-provider reproducibility semantics | AI | 250 |
| 4 | RFR-2026-015 | Automated confidence-decay and frontier refresh | Tooling | 102 |
| 5 | RFR-2026-003 | Matched incremental-utility experiment | Experimentation | 490 |
The opportunity records contain source sections, challenged assumptions, supporting evidence, dependencies, methodology, outputs, and success criteria. Repeated opportunities are semantic links to one repository-wide record rather than duplicated records.