Current State: document frontier

Source and coverage

• Source: CURRENT_STATE.md
• Canonical ID: missing; path-derived frontier identity used
• Lifecycle status: draft
• Artifact type: research-document
• Version: 0.1
• Confidence: not declared
• Inclusion rule: explicit authority/current-state dependency
• Analysis unit: PROGRAM-STATE

Phase 1 — knowledge extraction

• Primary objective: State active work, accepted evidence, threats, and the next research action.
• Primary claims: ECR-000003 is complete under review. Structural stability signals are weak and provider-dependent. Negative non-isomorphic controls are the selected next action.
• Supporting evidence: The source's declared references and the co-analyzed records listed in the analysis-unit frontier.
• Methodology: Machine-readable dashboard synthesized from evidence-run and review-board artifacts.
• Accepted/current findings: The current comparator baseline is 3.1.0. False structural equivalence is a material threat.
• Rejected or unsupported findings: Framework Engineering is proven. Universal grammar is proven. Product systems are validated by ECR-000003.
• Assumptions: Dashboard generation correctly reflects authoritative sources. Queue priority approximates information gain.
• Limitations: Current-state prose also retains older broad activity descriptions. Review is not fully closed.
• Known uncertainties: False-positive rate; Human baseline; Recognition mechanism; Provider interaction.
• Declared headings inspected: Current State; Foundation; Active Measurement Instrument; Active Corpus Work; Active Research; Active Experiments; Research Operating System; Active Evidence Runs; Open Questions; Next Milestone; Current Theory Status; Current Phase; Current Instrument; Current Explainability Layer; Current Goal; Current Focus.

Phase 2 — unresolved unknowns

• False-positive rate
• Human baseline
• Recognition mechanism
• Provider interaction

Phase 3 — adversarial challenge

CURRENT_STATE presents a broad active theory program, while the 2026-07-28 boundary REP requires a narrower research-program/profile posture.

Evidence that would materially change this assessment includes a completed independent replication, a preregistered negative control, a matched causal comparison, a governance disposition, or a demonstrated failure of the measurement and integrity instruments relevant to this source.

Top five traceable opportunities

The opportunity records contain source sections, challenged assumptions, supporting evidence, dependencies, methodology, outputs, and success criteria. Repeated opportunities are semantic links to one repository-wide record rather than duplicated records.