research-document

Knowledge Artifact Characterization Sheet (KACS)

Knowledge Artifact Characterization Sheet (KACS)

Status: Working draft

Purpose

KACS is the characterization record used before artifact classification.

Characterize first, classify second.

KACS is intended to reduce premature labeling by recording observable artifact properties before reviewers assign identity and capabilities.

All classifications remain provisional.

Use categorical confidence only.

FEMS-1 is the active measurement instrument for this record.

KACS Fields

Field Purpose
artifact.id Stable artifact identifier
artifact.name Preferred artifact name
artifact.common_aliases Common alternative names
artifact.domain Domain context for the artifact
artifact.lifecycle Lifecycle status using allowed values
review.analyst Primary analyst
review.date Characterization date
review.measurement_standard Measurement instrument used
review.status Review status using allowed values
review.reviewer Reviewer name when available
review.review_notes Review notes and disagreements
identity.value Identity by dominant purpose
identity.evidence Evidence supporting identity
identity.alternatives_considered Alternatives considered and rejected
identity.confidence Categorical confidence
identity.notes Identity-specific ambiguity notes
capabilities.values Zero or more reusable functions the artifact can perform
capabilities.evidence Evidence supporting capability selection
capabilities.confidence Categorical confidence
capabilities.notes Capability-specific notes
composition.framework_grammar.primary Primary framework grammar only when framework characteristics are present
composition.framework_grammar.supporting Supporting framework grammar only when present
composition.primitive_composition Primitive composition only when reasoning structure exists
composition.evidence Evidence supporting composition
composition.confidence Categorical confidence
composition.notes Composition notes
domain.primary Primary domain
domain.secondary Secondary domains
classification_notes Cross-cutting ambiguity and rationale

Allowed Values

Lifecycle values:

  • established
  • emerging
  • historical
  • deprecated
  • unknown

Review statuses:

  • draft
  • reviewed
  • disputed
  • superseded

Confidence values:

  • low
  • medium
  • high
  • mixed
  • unknown

Rules

  • Characterization precedes classification.
  • Identity should contain exactly one value.
  • Identity and capabilities should be recorded separately.
  • Framework grammar should be recorded only when framework characteristics are present.
  • Primitive composition should be recorded only when a reasoning structure exists.
  • Uncertainty should be preserved explicitly in notes.
  • Numeric scores should not be used.

Minimal Template

artifact:
  id:
  name:
  common_aliases:
  domain:
  lifecycle:

review:
  analyst:
  date:
  measurement_standard:
  status:
  reviewer:
  review_notes:

identity:
  value:
  evidence:
  alternatives_considered:
  confidence:
  notes:

capabilities:
  values:
  evidence:
  confidence:
  notes:

composition:
  framework_grammar:
    primary:
    supporting:
  primitive_composition:
  evidence:
  confidence:
  notes:

domain:
  primary:
  secondary:

classification_notes: