research-document FE-BND-PRIVATE-A06

A06 — Verification and reassessment triggers

A06 — Verification and reassessment triggers

  • Input [direct/inference]: A provisional judgment, its evidence and confidence, verification needs, and environmental change signals.
  • Operation [direct]: Verify before closure; in dynamic contexts specify when prior judgments should be reopened; revise or abandon beliefs when kill conditions occur.
  • Output [inference]: A verified or still-open judgment with recorded reassessment conditions.
  • Scope conditions [direct]: Dynamic contexts and revisable evidence-based judgments.
  • Failure conditions [direct/inference]: No verification before commitment, no trigger in a dynamic context, or a fired kill condition does not reopen the affected judgment.
  • Predicted effect [absent]: Canon does not state a directional measured effect for prospective triggers against a named control.
  • Measurement [absent]: No trigger-specific metric is canonical.
  • Named baseline [absent]: No baseline is specified.
  • Boundary condition [direct]: The trigger heuristic is provisional and may not be universal.
  • Implementation test [inference]: Seed a stated kill condition or context change and observe whether the linked judgment is reopened and verification rerun.
  • Decision rights [direct/inference]: The research constitution requires kill conditions to be respected; ownership of trigger definition and reopening is not assigned.
  • Uncertainty handling [direct]: Evidence changes belief confidence; unsupported certainty is prohibited.
  • Verification [direct]: Explicit verification precedes closure.
  • Provenance [inference]: Link trigger or kill condition to belief, evidence, verification, and resulting decision.
  • Implementation cost [absent]: Monitoring and retest cost are not estimated.
  • Limitations [direct]: Evidence comes from provisional synthesis and internal comparisons.
  • Fidelity check [inference]: Triggers are prospective, name the affected judgment, and can fire without curator discretion.
  • Null-capable future experiment [inference]: Compare prospective triggers with discretionary review; allow no change or worse false-alarm burden as outcomes.

Statement basis

  • Direct: Verification, reassessment, kill-condition, uncertainty, scope, and limitation statements.
  • Inference: Input/output form, failure path, seeded test, lineage, fidelity check, and future experiment.
  • Proposal-only: Reassessment-trigger heuristic.
  • Absent: Directional effect, metric, baseline, trigger thresholds, role assignment, and cost.