research-document

Next Research Decision

Next Research Decision

Status: proposal

Candidate A — Human Baseline Procedural Extraction

  • expected information gain: high
  • hypotheses affected: H002, H003, H015, H017, H018
  • falsification value: high
  • effort: high
  • dependency value: high
  • publication value: very_high
  • urgency: high

Candidate B — Negative Non-Isomorphic Controls

  • expected information gain: very_high
  • hypotheses affected: H002, H013, H016, H017, H018
  • falsification value: very_high
  • effort: medium
  • dependency value: very_high
  • publication value: very_high
  • urgency: very_high

Candidate C — Model-Version Stability

  • expected information gain: medium
  • hypotheses affected: H003, H015
  • falsification value: medium
  • effort: medium
  • dependency value: medium
  • publication value: medium
  • urgency: medium

Candidate D — Additional Procedural Families

  • expected information gain: high
  • hypotheses affected: H003, H017, H018
  • falsification value: high
  • effort: high
  • dependency value: medium
  • publication value: high
  • urgency: medium

Candidate E — Recognition-Control Replication

  • expected information gain: high
  • hypotheses affected: H013, H016
  • falsification value: high
  • effort: medium
  • dependency value: high
  • publication value: high
  • urgency: high

Candidate B — Negative Non-Isomorphic Controls

Rationale

  • The largest current interpretive risk is false structural equivalence.
  • EXP-003 produced the strongest candidate theoretical signal, so the next test should be adversarial rather than confirmatory.
  • Negative controls would directly test whether the instrument incorrectly reports stable structure when only superficial similarity is present.
  • This decision also informs H013, H016, H017, and H018 at once.

Alternatives Considered

  • Human baseline remains the strongest follow-on for publication quality, but it is more expensive and should benefit from a sharper adversarial model-side test first.
  • Recognition-control replication remains important, but it narrows one threat rather than addressing false equivalence directly.

Not Authorized Automatically

  • Do not create ECR-000004 from this proposal alone.