hypothesis

H016 Review

H016 Review

  • Hypothesis ID: H016
  • Name: Structural Recognition
  • Current statement: Models may recognize procedural families from topology or structural cues alone.
  • Research question: Does recognition persist from structure even when higher-level semantic cues are reduced?
  • Prior direction and strength: active / low
  • Prior kill-condition status: not_tested

Evidence Supporting

  • EXP-001 retained mixed backbone outputs under topology perturbation while recognition categories varied. Source: research/evidence-runs/ECR-000003-representation-sensitivity/experiments/EXP-001-topology-perturbation/comparison/generated-v3.1/exp-001-comparison-summary.md
  • Explainability recorded repeated recognition_without_structural_effect cases. Source: research/evidence-runs/ECR-000003-representation-sensitivity/comparison/ECR-000003-explainability-summary.md

Evidence Challenging

  • EXP-001 still produced mixed backbone rather than consistently stable topology-only recovery. Source: research/evidence-runs/ECR-000003-representation-sensitivity/experiments/EXP-001-topology-perturbation/comparison/generated-v3.1/exp-001-comparison-summary.md
  • No accepted pure graph-only control is part of the final ECR-000003 evidence set.

Mixed Evidence

  • ECR-000003 keeps the structural-recognition question active, but does not isolate it cleanly.

Provider, Representation, and Domain Effects

  • Some providers may be more sensitive to structural cues than others, but current evidence is not clean enough to separate that from general recognition bias.

Relevant Instrument Findings

  • Comparator outputs can show recognition states and structural stability side by side, but the underlying packets were not designed as a decisive structure-only test.

Threats

  • topology may still carry recognizable meaning
  • perturbations may not be neutral
  • missing graph-only control in accepted evidence

Alternative Explanations

  • Recognition may be driven more by residual semantic cueing than by topology alone.
  • Apparent structural recognition could be a byproduct of generic procedural priors.

Kill Condition

  • Current kill condition: graph-only topology variants consistently reduce recognition while preserving extracted structure.
  • Status: not_tested

Proposed Direction

waiting

Proposed Evidence Strength

insufficient

Board Recommendation

defer

Rationale

This hypothesis remains live but not reviewable to conclusion from accepted ECR-000003 evidence alone.

Next Evidence Needed

  • graph-only recognition-control replication
  • low-cue topology controls
  • targeted provider comparison

Human Decision

  • Decision:
  • Reviewer:
  • Date: