FE-012B Reviewer Run

Date: 2026-06-28

Method: Internal same-model review pass using the FE-012B evaluation rubric.

P01 Emergency food distribution after a regional flood

• internal_coherence: strong
• completeness: moderate
• simplicity: strong
• missing_reasoning_steps: moderate
• primitive_sufficiency: strong
• unnecessary_primitives: unclear
• recognizability: strong
• notes: The sequence is coherent and operationally plausible. It risks underrepresenting option generation but still functions as a procedural framework.

P02 Museum exhibit evaluation process

• internal_coherence: moderate
• completeness: moderate
• simplicity: moderate
• missing_reasoning_steps: moderate
• primitive_sufficiency: moderate
• unnecessary_primitives: unclear
• recognizability: moderate
• notes: Coherent, but somewhat compressed. The lack of explicit verification or experimentation makes the framework more evaluative than iterative.

P03 Coordinating autonomous underwater robots

• internal_coherence: moderate
• completeness: weak
• simplicity: moderate
• missing_reasoning_steps: weak
• primitive_sufficiency: weak
• unnecessary_primitives: none apparent
• recognizability: moderate
• notes: The framework is usable, but the suspected missing synchronization function is a real gap. Coordination timing is not well represented.

P04 Prioritizing habitat restoration projects

• internal_coherence: strong
• completeness: strong
• simplicity: moderate
• missing_reasoning_steps: moderate
• primitive_sufficiency: strong
• unnecessary_primitives: unclear
• recognizability: strong
• notes: This is one of the cleaner syntheses. It shows why Compare and Prioritize may need to remain distinct from generic evaluation.

P05 Investigating contamination in a pharmaceutical plant

• internal_coherence: strong
• completeness: strong
• simplicity: moderate
• missing_reasoning_steps: moderate
• primitive_sufficiency: strong
• unnecessary_primitives: none apparent
• recognizability: strong
• notes: Diagnostic flow is coherent and domain-appropriate without obvious primitive inflation.

P06 Designing an archaeological excavation workflow

• internal_coherence: strong
• completeness: moderate
• simplicity: moderate
• missing_reasoning_steps: moderate
• primitive_sufficiency: strong
• unnecessary_primitives: unclear
• recognizability: moderate
• notes: The framework is coherent, though it starts to look like a generic evidence-sensitive field workflow rather than a sharply distinctive excavation method.

P07 Responding to misinformation during a public health event

• internal_coherence: strong
• completeness: strong
• simplicity: weak
• missing_reasoning_steps: moderate
• primitive_sufficiency: strong
• unnecessary_primitives: moderate
• recognizability: strong
• notes: Coherent but heavy. Communication and prioritization do a great deal of work, and the sequence risks becoming cumbersome.

P08 Coordinating lunar habitat maintenance

• internal_coherence: moderate
• completeness: moderate
• simplicity: moderate
• missing_reasoning_steps: weak
• primitive_sufficiency: weak
• unnecessary_primitives: none apparent
• recognizability: moderate
• notes: The framework functions, but scheduling and dependency handling appear underrepresented.

P09 Selecting scientific instruments for an interstellar probe

• internal_coherence: strong
• completeness: moderate
• simplicity: strong
• missing_reasoning_steps: moderate
• primitive_sufficiency: strong
• unnecessary_primitives: none apparent
• recognizability: strong
• notes: Compact and coherent. Another case where Compare and Prioritize appear structurally important.

P10 Managing restoration of a historic cathedral

• internal_coherence: moderate
• completeness: moderate
• simplicity: moderate
• missing_reasoning_steps: weak
• primitive_sufficiency: moderate
• unnecessary_primitives: unclear
• recognizability: moderate
• notes: The framework is coherent, but phased sequencing pressure suggests the vocabulary may still be missing a temporally explicit coordination move.

Cross-Problem Reviewer Pattern

• Strongest cases:
  • P01
  • P04
  • P05
  • P09
• Most resistant cases:
  • P03
  • P08
  • P10
• Recurrent weakness: Coordination-heavy problems strain the vocabulary where timing, dependency management, or synchronization become central.