FE-012B Internal Run Summary

Date: 2026-06-28

Status: Internal same-model synthesis and review pass completed.

Problem Count

• Total novelty problems executed: 10
• Completed without introducing a new primitive: 7
• Completed with documented missing primitive pressure: 3
• Total synthesis failures: 0

Primitive Sufficiency Index

70 percent

Interpretation:

Seven of ten synthesis attempts were completed without a documented need for an additional primitive.

This metric is experimental and should not be treated as validated.

Missing Primitive Requests

• Synchronize
• Schedule
• Sequence

These requests appeared in coordination-heavy or phased-maintenance problems rather than in evaluation or diagnostic problems.

Primitive Reuse Pattern

Most reused primitives:

• Bound
• Decide
• Reassess
• Prioritize
• Communicate

Least reused primitives:

• Explain
• Reflect
• Generate

Reviewer Pattern

• Internal coherence: Most syntheses were judged moderate to strong.
• Completeness: Coordination-heavy problems produced the most gaps.
• Simplicity: Some syntheses remained compact, but others became heavy when multiple control functions were stacked together.
• Primitive sufficiency: Strongest in diagnostic, prioritization, and selection problems. Weakest in synchronization and phased-maintenance problems.

High-Level Interpretation

• The frozen primitive vocabulary appears expressive enough to generate coherent procedural reasoning frameworks at a generic level across diverse domains.
• The vocabulary is less convincing for problems that depend on explicit temporal coordination, synchronization, or phased dependency management.
• Compare and Prioritize continue to look structurally important rather than disposable candidates.
• The internal run supports further study, but it does not show that the synthesized frameworks are useful or distinctive enough for practical deployment.

Methodological Limits

• Same model family used for synthesis and review
• No independent reviewer agreement
• Novelty problems were designed by the same research direction evaluating the result
• Prior framework knowledge may still have influenced composition despite the ban on copying named frameworks

Provisional Conclusion

FE-012B did not show that the frozen primitive vocabulary is universally sufficient.

It did show that the vocabulary can often generate coherent procedural structures without immediate collapse into artifact-specific invention.