Execution summary — FE-CFDP-CLAUDE-001

First real (non-synthetic) provider execution of the ROS–FE pilot profile, role framework-discovery-agent, target framework: the OODA Loop.

Produced five draft source records, a draft framework record, a draft Framework Genome, a draft observation, and a draft contradiction record — all held inside this execution directory pending a separate, authorized review/promotion step into the canonical ros-profile/records/ tree.

Two primary Boyd briefings and one secondary scholarly monograph were bibliographically identified and cross-checked via search/preview summaries but not fetched and read in full text; every downstream claim attributed to them is scoped accordingly, and unread claims are marked not-reported rather than inferred.

The execution surfaced one genuine, unresolved contradiction (a disputed Korean War kill-ratio figure used as empirical support for the framework's tempo thesis) and one representational discrepancy (the popular OODA diagram is not Boyd's own diagram). Neither is resolved here; both are preserved as open evidence.

No claim of OODA Loop effectiveness was made. No canonical FE theory was changed. Classification remains Stage A: incomplete, Stage B: blocked-before-stage-b, inconclusive, Stage B authorized: false.

ros-fe:registry, ros-fe:validate, ros-fe:test, and research:validate all ran and passed after this execution's files were added, confirming the write-boundary decision (drafts kept out of the canonical records tree) did not disturb existing validation.

Next action: a human or a separately authorized profile-maintenance step should review these five draft record types, decide whether to promote any into ros-profile/records/, and — per FE-CFDP's next_execution field — commission an independent second-provider execution on the same target for comparison.