research-document
Research journal — FE-BOUNDARY-001
Research journal — FE-BOUNDARY-001
2026-07-28 — Registration and freeze
- Confirmed ROS and Framework Engineering worktrees were clean.
- Ran the existing ROS and FE baselines; all required checks passed.
- Read FE-MISSION-001 and its parent evaluation package.
- Registered ROS mission
MS-FE-2026-B001. - Froze four competing explanations, twelve comparison dimensions, ten comparator fields, source inclusion rules, and decision rules before interpreting external evidence.
- Preserved the scientific constraint that Framework Engineering remains a provisional methodology/research program; this mission cannot authorize Stage B or modify canonical theory.
Open profile observations
- Profile v1.0 is sufficient to establish a write boundary and handoff shape.
- Its validator scans canonical profile records but not draft records inside provider executions.
- The profile has no registered generic
research-streamabstraction for FE-MISSION-001; this execution declares the mission ID and will report the compatibility issue rather than silently broadeningFE-CFDP.
2026-07-28 — Evidence collection
- Registered 30 primary, official, or explicitly labeled supporting sources.
- Covered every comparator and all 12 frozen dimensions.
- Labeled ISO abstract-only access and the secondary cybernetics compilation.
- Recorded exact-term negative search as bounded evidence rather than proof of absence.
- Preserved a machine-readable source index and a detailed evidence registry.
2026-07-28 — Falsification and subsumption
- Steelmanned every adjacent field before judging residual scope.
- Found no individual full subsumption of the exact FE integration.
- Found substantial collective functional subsumption: every identified FE mechanism has an established home in adjacent work.
- Found no clearly non-subsumed FE causal mechanism.
- Distinguished the coherent object-level integration from evidence of utility.
2026-07-28 — Confidence and classification
- Updated the distinct-discipline interpretation of FEH-001 from Low to Very Low.
- Assigned Moderate confidence to the coherent integrated-profile interpretation.
- Kept incremental utility at Very Low and external generality at Low.
- Classified current FE as a repository-centered research program and candidate integrated engineering profile.
2026-07-28 — Architecture and implementation audit
- Defined the research-to-engineering release architecture, state separation, validation stack, minimal/full modes, and maturity gates.
- Audited profile v1.0 without changing its accepted baseline.
- Identified execution-local validation, packet completeness, duplicate IDs, typed references, registry completeness/staleness, negative tests, and cross-repository locks as the priority v1.1 gaps.
2026-07-28 — Next experiment
- Specified a four-arm matched study: minimal baseline, strong adjacent profile, full FE, and FE-specific-component ablation.
- Selected downstream correct action and evidence integrity as co-primary outcomes.
- Included blinding, documentation-dose matching, provider blocking, cost, cognitive burden, held-out replication, negative controls, and kill rules.
Closure
The boundary mission reached evidence saturation for the decision it can
support. More unstructured literature review cannot establish incremental
utility. The successor package is
research/evaluations/FE-BOUNDARY-2026-07-28/. Draft records remain inside
this provider execution until reviewed; canonical theory was not modified.