hypothesis
FE-008A
FE-008A
Identity-Capability Principle
Status: Hypothesis
Research Question
Can knowledge artifacts be described more accurately by separating identity from capabilities?
Hypothesis
A knowledge artifact's identity is determined by its dominant purpose.
A knowledge artifact's capabilities describe the functions it can perform.
Identity and capabilities are related but independent properties.
Separating them should improve classification consistency and reduce reviewer disagreement.
Predictions
- Reviewers will agree more frequently on identity than under the previous primary/secondary artifact model.
- Capabilities will exhibit natural overlap across artifact identities.
- Framework Engineering Cube will become simpler.
- Boundary cases such as Scrum, Kanban, MITRE ATT&CK, BPMN, TOGAF, and CMMI will become easier to classify.
Evidence
Derived from FE-008 Pilot Batch 001 and Batch 002.
Success Criteria
- Improved reviewer agreement.
- Reduced ambiguity.
- Cleaner operational definitions.
Failure Criteria
- Capabilities become indistinguishable from identity.
- Reviewer disagreement remains unchanged.