research-document
Scientific Claims Registry
Scientific Claims Registry
Status values:
- candidate_supported
- candidate_mixed
- unsupported
- not_reviewed
| Claim ID | Claim | Status | Evidence | Key Limitation | Publicly Defensible |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C001 | Structural backbone may remain more stable than primitive sequence across some topology, representation, and domain changes. | candidate_supported | EXP-003 mostly stable backbone; explainability distinguishes elaboration from backbone impact. |
Primitive and constraint disagreement remain. | yes, with caution |
| C002 | Recognition and watched terminology do not always force structural divergence. | candidate_supported | recognition_without_structural_effect: 40; terminology_leakage_only: 28. |
This does not prove recognition is irrelevant. | yes, with caution |
| C003 | Provider-specific decomposition and granularity differences are material in ECR-000003. | candidate_supported | Provider-specific recognition patterns and repeated high-priority explainability differences. | No human baseline. | yes |
| C004 | Representation changes alone do not reliably preserve every measured layer. | candidate_supported | EXP-002 mixed backbone and disagreement in primitive/constraint layers. |
Representation sample remains limited. | yes |
| C005 | Cross-domain procedural isomorphism is proven. | unsupported | None. | EXP-003 is suggestive only. |
no |
| C006 | Framework Engineering is validated as a scientific discipline. | unsupported | None. | ECR-000003 is one evidence packet with unresolved uncertainty. | no |
| C007 | Clarity, EDF, or HelixNote outcomes are validated by ECR-000003. | unsupported | None. | Product testing is separate from research evidence. | no |