research-document
Grammar Hypotheses v0.1
Grammar Hypotheses v0.1
Status: Hypotheses only
These are not accepted primitives.
Purpose
Record the current grammar hypotheses emerging from FE-012A and FE-012B without treating them as settled architecture.
Hypothesis 1
Procedural reasoning grammar and execution or coordination grammar may be distinct.
Rationale:
FE-012A reconstructed many reasoning-heavy artifacts without major pressure for coordination primitives.
FE-012B produced missing-primitive pressure in coordination-heavy synthesis problems.
Hypothesis 2
Reasoning-heavy artifacts may rely primarily on primitives such as:
- Bound
- Observe
- Interpret
- Explain
- Generate
- Evaluate
- Decide
- Verify
- Reflect
- Reassess
These appear repeatedly in diagnostic, analytical, and evaluative flows.
Hypothesis 3
Execution-heavy artifacts may require additional primitives such as:
- Synchronize
- Schedule
- Sequence
- Allocate
- Coordinate
These are hypotheses, not accepted primitives.
They are pressure terms inferred from FE-012B gaps, not validated additions.
Hypothesis 4
Some primitives may function as bridge primitives across both grammars.
Possible bridge candidates:
- Bound
- Observe
- Decide
- Communicate
- Reassess
Current Weaknesses
- The current evidence comes from internal runs rather than independent multi-analyst testing.
- The candidate execution primitives have not been independently extracted from blinded artifacts.
- The boundary between
Evaluate,Compare, andPrioritizeremains unsettled.
Next Tests
- Blind extraction focused on coordination-heavy artifacts
- Independent synthesis with and without candidate execution primitives
- Direct comparison of reasoning-heavy and execution-heavy artifact families