research-frontier-record RFR-2026-008

ROS profile integrity and negative-test suite

RFR-2026-008: ROS profile integrity and negative-test suite

Research opportunity

Close the profile's high-severity identity, execution-packet, parsing, and referential-integrity gaps.

Background

The accepted pilot profile passes current tests, but the audit finds five high-severity controls absent.

Origin documents and trace

Specific assumption challenged: A green current validator implies trustworthy execution and lineage records.

Supporting evidence: Provider records are not parsed, duplicate IDs pass, declared links can point nowhere, and negative tests are absent.

Unknowns

  • Failure-mode coverage
  • Migration compatibility
  • Integrity guarantees under malformed submissions

Dependencies

  • None; can begin immediately.

Suggested REP and methodology

Create REP-2026-008. Write fixture-based negative tests first; add duplicate and typed-reference checks; parse and schema-validate manifests; verify required files and declared outputs; retain human promotion authority.

Expected outputs

  • v1.1 proposal
  • Negative fixture suite
  • Migration and compatibility report

Success criteria

Each PA-001–005 failure is caught, v1.0 fixtures remain interpretable, and no unattended canonical promotion is introduced.

Execution recommendation

  • Recommended agent: research-tooling integrity agent
  • Estimated effort: medium
  • Expected knowledge gained: Prevents corrupt evidence lineage from masquerading as valid research.
  • Frontier Score: 295
  • Score inputs: knowledge gain 4/5; impact 5/5; cross-project reuse 5/5; scientific importance 3/5; dependency cost 2/5; implementation difficulty 3/5.
  • Score calculation: 4 × 5 × 5 × 3 − 2 − 3 = 295.
  • Score status: structured expert judgment, not measured utility.